Last Week’s Equity Put/Call Ratios Suggest A Pullback

The CBOE Equity put/call ratio was consistently low last week. The 5-day average is 0.53, which is nearly 22% below the 200-day average of 0.68. When the 5-day average gets extremely low as it is now that can lead to a short-term market pullback. Below is a study that exemplifies this.


Most notable and also most compelling about this study is the fact that all instances have occurred after the March bottom. Prior to that the 5-day ratio had never stretched 20% below the 200-day. This is another example of just how extreme the current bull move has become. It also makes the results that much more impressive from a negative standpoint since they were achieved during a 60% run-up in the market.

The 2009 Rally – Breadth Without Compare

Yesterday I looked at Worden Bros. T21111, which measures the number of stocks trading at least 2 standard deviations above their 200ma. As you’ll recall, it was hitting an all-time high. (Data goes back to 1986.)

With Wednesday’s big rally, we are now seeing even more extraordinary numbers. Not only is T2111 up to 58.51%, but T2112, which measures the % of stocks trade at least 2 standard deviation above their 40-DAY moving average, is also in record territory. It is showing that a remarkable 57.19% of stocks are now stretched far above their 40-ma’s.

The action in T2112 truly exemplifies the uniqueness of the rally since March. Below is a long-term look at the indicator. Note that from 1986 through 2008 the highest reading this indicator ever registered was 37.22% in November of 2004. That record has been blown away repeatedly over the last 6 months.


Let’s now zoom in on this year to better see what I’m saying.



There simply is no comparison over the last 23 years to what we are seeing in this recent rally. There have now 5 distinct periods in the last 6 months where T2112 has rallied through the old high. And now we’re seeing the most extreme breadth numbers of all.

Never Have So Many Stocks Been So Stretched Above Their 200ma.

Near the end of August I discussed that some of the breadth measures tracked by Worden were near all-time highs. This situation corrected itself as the market embarked on a brief selloff. Tonight two of their indicators actually registered their highest readings ever. These are T2109 and T21111 which track the number of stocks 1 and 2 standard deviations above their 200-day moving averages. Below is a long-term chart of T21111 with full history of the indicator going back to 1986.


I marked on the chart the 4 other instances that came close to the current reading. What you may notice is that these spikes were generally brief. Every case was followed by at least a mild selloff that worked off the severely overbought conditions. In no case did the extreme spike mark the end to the bull market that created it. It’s dangerous to read too much into only 4 instances, but a short-term pullback does seem reasonable. The current reading does not suggest a long-term top, though.

The 1st Profitable Close Exit Strategy – When It’s Appropriate

Today I just want to touch briefly on the exit parameters for the “2 Days In Chop” systems that I discussed yesterday. The exit strategy is basically a time stop married with a “first profitable close” exit. For many traders, a “first profitable close” exit may seem like nothing more than a ploy to inflate the winning % of the system and not an appropriate exit technique to put into practice.

Sometimes this is true. In other cases though, the 1st Profitable Close exit is appropriate and effective. “2 Days In Chop” is one of those cases. Recall the premise of the system was based on taking advantage of the extremely choppy market conditions that had been identified. It’s those choppy conditions that make the 1st Profitable Close strategy viable.

When conditions are especially choppy and the market is constantly swinging back and forth, the expectation is for that chop to persist. This would suggest a move in the direction of the trade is more likely to be reversed than to follow through. So with a system like “2 Days in Chop”, the expectation flips as soon as the trade becomes profitable. Since a reversal is more likely than continued follow through the correct play is to take the quick profit.

Obviously an exit strategy like this only works well when trading a reversal / mean reverting system in a choppy environment. In a different environment, or if trading a breakout system, an exit strategy that looks for quick profits would be a disaster.

Other techniques that work well when trading overbought/oversold conditions would include using a short term oscillator and waiting for that oscillator to revert back to a neutral state, or using a short-term moving average (such as a 5-day) and then exiting the trade on a cross of the moving average.

2 Days In Chop Systems – 1 Year Later

About a year ago I showed 2 systems that looked to take advantage of the market’s choppy nature. Since that time I have tracked the performance of these two incredibly simple systems in the Quantifiable Edges Subscriber Letter. I’ve referred to them as the “2 Days In Chop” systems. As a quick refresher the rules for each are below:

Long System (2 Days Down In Chop):
1) Buy the SPX any time it closes lower 2 days in a row.
2) Sell the 1st profitable close up to 3 days later.
3) Sell on the 3rd day regardless of profitability.

Short System (2 Days Up In Chop):
1) Short the SPX any time it closes higher 2 days in a row.
2) Cover the 1st profitable close up to 4 days later.
3) Cover on the 4th day regardless of profitability.

A few quick notes:
At the time the market was locked in a downtrend which is why I gave the shorts an extra day.
I noted the systems were very raw and were not something I would trade “as is”.

Below I will show the combined performance of the 2 systems since I introduced them. In upcoming posts I’ll discuss how I use the systems and also discuss some thoughts on them and some ideas in which the basic systems could be improved.

Here is the performance over the last year +.

A 73% return would seem very impressive for something so simple. It has had a bit of a drawdown lately, though. Below is a profit curve.


The system peaked on 6/22 and has had a few rough trades as of late. Still, the recent drawdown is very small compared to the overall gains of the system.

So why haven’t I simply traded the system “as is” for the last year? I guess you could say that I’m just not smart enough to blindly trade a system this dumb.

I’m getting a little smarter, though. And I’ll have more in upcoming posts.

SPY Rising While SPY Volume Declines

In May of 2008 I showed how 3 higher closes in the SPX (while under to 200ma) had different implications depending on the volume pattern. Tuesday we had this 3-higher closes pattern appear in the SPY while SPY volume declined all three days. This is a slightly different twist and one worth examining:

(click table to enlarge)

This setup appears especially bearish over the 1st week. Possible bearish implications extend out much further than just a week, though.

Would you like to be made aware any time this setup triggers in the future? The Quantifinder does it for you! Versions of the Quantifinder are available with both gold and silver subscriptions.
As I ready to publish this I see that Cobra also noticed this pattern last night. Check out his take as he identifies several recent occurrences on his chart.

Labor Day Week Edges

From a seasonality standpoint, Labor Day week has historically been a bit weak.

(click table to enlarge)


Tuesday through Thursday have shown risk/reward to favor the bears, though whether the market is up or down has basically been a coin toss. If we look at times like the present where the market has made gains in the weeks leading up to Labor Day, you’ll find the implication is a bit more bearish.
(click table to enlarge)

This isn’t the most compelling edge I’ve ever published, but for a study based primarily on seasonality, it’s not bad.

Is Thursday’s Low Volume Troubling?

In last night’s Subscriber Letter I examined whether the relatively low volume on Thursday’s bounce should be concerning. I examined it a few different ways. Below is one series of tests I showed. First let’s look at what happened when volume came in higher on a bounce following some severe short-term oversold conditions.

(click table to enlarge)

Interesting that the high volume bounces failed to follow through. The number of instances is a bit low but the numbers are fairly compelling anyway. Let’s see how this compares to low volume bounces:

(click table to enlarge)

Here the results have a solid bullish tilt.

These tests suggest that Thursday’s light volume should not be of any concern. In fact, it may be a market positive.

A Long-Term Look At the Nasdaq Advance/Decline

Woodshedder is starting a new series called “Indicators and edges” in which he will be testing the effectiveness of different indicators. I’m looking forward to reading it. Last night he posted some baseline results of the general market. In doing so he noted that the percentage of up days on his list of stocks fell much below the % of up days for the major indices. In noticing this he asked if anyone had a possible explanation.

I think a long-term look at the Nasdaq Advance/Decline line could explain a lot of it. I pulled the below data from Worden Bros. TC2000.

Here we see that the Nasdaq Adv/Decl has consistently dropped over the years. While this chart only goes back to 1990, the strong negative bias exists all the way back to the inception of the Nasdaq in 1971. Even during the Nasdaq bubble days of the late 90’s the Nasdaq Advance/Decline couldn’t muster a rising slope. Worden Bros. was obviously aware of this tendency when they set their beginning value at 10,000 rather than 0.

Over the 1990 – present time period shown above the NYSE Advance/Decline line has seen a slight decline, but it doesn’t have the consistent negative bias of the Nasdaq.

This is mostly due to the fact that the Nasdaq has lower listing standards than the NYSE, so if a company is going to go broke it is more likely to do so on the Nasdaq. An issue which IPOs at $25 and heads to $0 will contribute a lot of declining votes each day along the way, and that is more likely to take place in the Nasdaq.

This was first explained to me by Tom McClellan. If you’re interested in breadth statistics, I’d highly recommend checking out some of the work of the McClellans.

You may also want to check back on Woodshedder’s studies over the next few weeks as well. I’m sure there will be some interesting results.

False Breakdown Often Leads to Move Higher

The fact that the market tried to break down from its recent range Thursday and then reversed to close at a new high could be interpreted as bullish. Below is a test that describes Thursday’s action:

(click table to enlarge)

Pretty solid results across the board suggest an upside breakout appears more likely than a pullback at this point.

Percent of Stocks Above Their 200ma’s Hitting Extreme Levels

Some extreme readings are appearing in a few Worden Bros. indicators that look at stocks relative to their 200 day moving averages. One is T2107, which simply looks at the percentage of stocks trading above their 200ma. The other is T2109, which looks at the percentage of stocks trading at least 1 standard deviation above their 200ma. Both indicators are near all time highs (dating back to 1986). In fact, the only period of time in which these indicators registered higher readings was in the beginning of 2004. Below is a chart of T2107 which illustrates this:

This demonstrates just how extreme the current move is in terms of breadth. Also interesting about the chart is that we aren’t that far removed time-wise from extremely low readings. Extreme overbought doesn’t necessarily mean a decline is about to begin. In fact the last time these levels were reached in 2004, the market continued to trudge higher for about 2 ½ months before finally beginning a meaningful correction.

Relative Equity Put/Call Reading on Friday is Lowest Ever

I’ve discussed the equity put/call ratio a few times recently. In the June 12th blog I showed how extremely low readings have often been followed by selloffs. I also did a follow up to that study in the August 14th blog. The criteria I used was a put/call ratio of more than 25% below its 200-day moving average.

The CBOE has only reported the equity put/call ratios since 10/2003. On Friday the CBOE reported the lowest relative equity put/call ever. It came in at 0.39, which is nearly 45% below its 200-day moving average. This is only the 2nd time it has closed as much as 40% below the 200. The other time was 11/15/04. The SPX dropped 0.7% the next day but that was basically the end of the selloff. A few more days of chop was followed by a further market rally.

Below I’ve listed all instances where the equity put/call came in 33% or more below its 200ma.


It will be interesting to see if the inclination to sell off following extremely low equity put/call ratios can overcome the market’s recent positive momentum.